We are in a crisis in the evolution of human society. It’s unique to both human and geologic history. It has never happened before and it can’t possibly happen again. Albert Bates, author of The Financial Collapse Survival Guide and Cookbook, brings you along on his personal journey.
It is Wednesday September 28 and we are sitting on the plane in Nashville waiting to take off for Hangzhou via Detroit and Beijing. This China trip is merely a warm-up for our Fall itinerary that has us traversing four continents in four weeks, including six ocean crossings. It is almost like a presidential campaign whistlestop tour, except they never utter a word about the thermometer in the room and everywhere we land we are making our pitch for reversing climate change by the redesign of the built environment. It is understandable that politicians won’t touch this subject. We are shredding the mystique of the land use patterns, collectively called civilization, that have served humans so poorly for the past eight millennia.
We spent August in Tennessee developing the lesson plans for the introductory workshops that will train a couple dozen soil activists in the People’s Republic and we are feeling pretty good about this stage of the trip now.
Then, in the run-up to blast off, we were tagged teamed by John Dennis Liu and Daniel Wahl, who wrangled us into cancelling scheduled events for late October and going straight from China to London for a meeting to assist British Commonwealth countries to prepare a new plan for COP-22 in Marrakech, one that will raise international ambition and stake out “plausibly impossible” but attainable goals to push the envelope of the Paris Agreement and the UN multilateral process. On October 28-29, a design charette, dubbed Regenerative Development to Reverse Climate Change, will give us the opportunity to make our elevator pitch to a very receptive audience of big wigs.
Now it is September 29 and we have left Hangzhou airport and driven 3 hours up winding roads into the mountains at night, eventually arriving at the Xu Ling village where our workshops will be held. Quail are singing to each other in the terraces, frogs croak from the creeks, and from the forested mountains there is the sound of a distant owl. Three hundred years before Lao Tsu, this small village was home to a sage named Wu Xixu, later to become the first Premier of the country. The mountain pass above the village is a relatively low one, so for thousands of years the main stone road between Shanghai on the coast and inland Nanjing, capital city for many empires, ran through here. When the pass was blocked in winter, porters would use a cave passage that crossed from Zhejiang to the adjacent province under the mountains.
As we rose the morning of October 1st we jotted a quick Suessian limerick:
There was a young man named Wu Who came from the village of Xu They thought him so fair They made him Premier This fellow they called Wu from Xu
XuLing village is at 29 North so having 29C days in October is not unusual, kind of like Mississippi or Alabama. They get snow in winter but they also have thatch palm and heliconia trees. The valley is a South-facing parabolic with mountains backing it to the North. The upper slopes of the valley are very steep but varied with different woods and bamboos. There is plenty of water; it flows through stone channels everywhere. Some of the trees we see are more than 1000 years old.
The stonework is of varying age; the oldest being most mostly massive freestack and then smaller, cut freestack, then fine mortared walls, then mud brick and cinderblock. Mud brick is illegal now — an overworked resource that has left ugly scars in many places. Cement brick and block is mandatory. Not even fired brick is permitted unless it is imported.
As we meet some of the villagers and students who have arrived for our workshops we observe that Chinese clothing is very westernized. Shoes are almost always state-of-the-art Nikes, Converses, Adidas and T-shirt slogans are usually in English even if the wearer doesn’t speak a word and may have no idea what it means. But surprisingly, many have done at least a year at a US university. Sometimes the ensemble of hair, glasses, clothes and iPhone 7 is so western you think the kid is USAnian except that when you ask them something they can’t comprehend a word. In contrast, there are kids who’ve learned almost perfect English just by watching internet movies and TV and prefer to affect old-style Chinese dress and hair styles, even the round glasses from a century earlier.
This contrast between the old and the new will be a recurrent theme of our month here. While many Chinese youth are enamored of consumer culture and willing to make great sacrifices to attain it, the Chinese ecovillage movement is mostly retrofuturist, showing deference, if not nostalgia, for lost culture. They seek as much a return to villageness as a breath of cleaner air and sip of cleaner water.
They are bucking a big trend, but lately they have been finding support in unusual quarters. Eleven years ago, the current President of China, then Governor and Party Committee Secretary of Zhejiang, went on a State visit to the rural villages to assess the needs of the people. What he discovered was a brewing catastrophe.
Globalization has been drawing people from the country to the cities for many decades, and until recently government policies encouraged it in order to fill the need for a gargantuan factory labor force. It recognized that this policy meant sacrificing agricultural capacity, but like most developing countries, was willing to make that trade-off because it figured that it could import food with its newly favorable trade balance, and a whole lot more.
What Xi Jinping saw nearly broke his heart. Long a champion of “Chinese values” and the “Chinese Dream,” Xi had hoped to revive Taoist practices of harmony in culture and nature. "He who rules by virtue is like the North Star," he said at a meeting of officials last year, quoting Confucius. "It maintains its place, and the multitude of stars pay homage.”
What he saw in the rural countryside was that all the teenagers, young people and middle-aged had left. There were only the very elderly — the grandparents — and the very young — the grandchildren — being supported by a combination of welfare services and remittances from distant families working in the cities. The terraces, on land too steep to use machinery, were in disrepair, overgrown with weeds and emergent forest. Buildings were crumbling and stray dogs roamed the streets. Food production had plummeted. The old hand tools were rusted and broken. The forests on the hillsides had been raided by timber companies and now mudslides wrecked the streams and threatened the villages.
The villagers said to Xi, “Look what we have lost!” They wanted back the forests and wildlife that made this a good place to live. Thus was born the two mountain theory.
Back in Shanghai, Xi gave a speech calling for two mountains. The first was development, including basic services to make peoples’ lives better. The second he called his “mountain of gold” — return of nature. Pure forests and pure water was what he called the real gold of China.
This was 11 years ago. In 2013 he became General Secretary of the Communist Party of China, President of the People's Republic of China, and the Chairman of the Central Military Commission, the most powerful consolidation of power since before the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989.
We are told that one reason the Sunshine Ecovillage Network has been successful in winning official support for its plan for rural revitalization in China, with a goal of 100 ecovillages by 2021, is that it chose to launch here in Zhejiang province, where the two mountains were first revealed to Xi Jinping.
At The Farm we celebrate Indigenous People’s Day with only
slightly more gratitude than other days. We shared a large covered-dish potluck
in the Great Hall, part of our still-under-construction EcoHostel. We welcomed
back our younger brothers and sisters who were up at Standing Rock helping in
whatever way The Farm can. We sent blessings to those who had gone up to take
their place.
It is not a little ironic that USAnians take a national
holiday to celebrate the lifesaving generosity of indigenous peoples towards
the Pilgrims while simultaneously unleashing water cannons, pepper spray and
dogs on those same peoples as they try to protect our shared patrimony, in
this case a river that affects the lives of 40 million people. We bless the
sacred water that makes our life possible, here, as well as there.
Two years have passed since we produced a video
mashup for a winter Indiegogo campaign, our last big crowdfunding effort. It
was a trifle dour, we admit, but as the Earth tilts its Northern Hemisphere
away from the sun and daylight gets scarcer, the plant-world moves underground,
and we bundle from the cold, it is easy to fall into thoughts of contraction
and decline.
Being overstretched from recent efforts, we could use some
serious donations again right now, but we find that there would be no point in
trying to revise or update that short video, because it is just as true today
as it was then, the US election notwithstanding.
Since we made that mashup, we went to the Paris climate
conference and watched as the world finally agreed to take some baby steps in
the right direction, which we, after Paul Hawken, now call “drawdown” — as in
taking carbon out the atmosphere and putting it back into the soil.
The 4 per 1000 initiative (the French government’s campaign — 4 grams increase of soil carbon per year in every kilogram of farmed earth) remains the best game in town, whether your town is Paris, Marrakech, or in 2017, Bonn. It would, in the French government's theory (supported by IPCC's notion of a "carbon budget" but called into question by the latest report cards from the Tyndall Centre and others) be enough to hold climate change at 1.5 degrees, if universally adopted.
That 2014 COP-20 proposal, “Soil for food security and climate” became part of the “Lima-Paris Action Agenda” and then, two weeks ago at COP-22, the “Global Climate Action Agenda,” but the word 'soil' only made it once into the Marrakech Action Proclamation at the end of COP-22, and that was in reference to the venue being "on African soil." The word 'agriculture' was completely absent.
However, if you read the outcome document liberally to assume the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC), or the UN's pledge system, constitutes the action agenda at present, then there may still be some hope.
While the 4 per 1000 initiative gained no new additions to the 37 nations who endorsed in Paris, many NDPs are starting to reflect the realization that putting carbon back in the ground might be a cheap way to meet their goals. This includes the United States, which last May issued a “Climate Smart” agriculture and forestry plan. The word 'biochar' does not appear in that 60-page plan. Pyrolysis is only mentioned in the context of a way to reduce methane from concentrated animal farming wastes. This is the US-DUH, remember?
The influence of heroic biochar researcher Hans Peter Schmidt was evident at the margins of the event, where Swiss biotech company Zaluvida Corporate AG pitched for venture capital from business leaders to support its natural solution to reduce methane emissions in cows, Mootral(TM). Mootral is a feed supplement made from biochar infused with garlic and citric extract. Just 10 grams a day reduces bovine flatulence 30 percent while increasing weight gain and lactose production. According to the literature handed out by Zaluvida, feeding every cow a daily dose of Mootral would be the same as taking 200 million cars off the road. An antibiotic version is scheduled for release next year after it receives patent approval.
This year we redoubled our efforts in those places where we think
we might do the most good. We went to the Dominican Republic to advise a
three-village ecodistrict of El Valle that will draw down massive amounts of
carbon while raising the standards of living of its rural peoples. The El Valle model shows
that environmental enhancement and economic development are not adversaries for
limited funds, but co-engines of the new, carbon-smart economy.
In March we taught the tenth annual permaculture course at Maya
Mountain Research Farm in Belize. Maya Mountain is significant to us because it
has it all: starting with poor soils and hilly terrain that had been in corn
and cattle too long, Christopher Nesbitt transformed it into one of the best
examples of integrated agroforestry and carbon drawdown on the planet, with
aquaponics, biochar and some of the best permaculture design that we can point
to. The more students from all over the world we can run through that place
every February, the better.
Back at The Farm we provided another season of permaculture
courses, apprenticeships and natural building through the Ecovillage Training Center, now in its 22nd year. We hosted the annual Kids to the Country summer
camp for city kids. From there we bounced to Mexico to advise a massive
3-ecovillage development called Puertas del Cielo that, like the project in the
Dominican Republic transforms the way humans construct their built environment.
The master plan is being developed by Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG), the Danish
architects who designed the new World Trade Center in lower Manhattan and the
Google complex in Silicon Valley. This is good news for ecovillage design.
In the fall we put together a team to go after the MacArthur
Foundation’s 100 and Change prize. Our proposal is, after the fashion of El Valle or Puertas, to transform the lives of
100 million farmers with biochar, B-corp cooperatives, and climate ecoforestry.
From there we flew to Corvallis, Oregon and the NorthAmerican Biochar Symposium and a meeting of the U.S. Biochar Initiative.
Biochar holds the key to unlocking our climate predicament. Like the first
Thanksgiving, it was a gift to us from the landlords, who learned how to make biochar-rich soils 8000 years before the Columbian Encounter, in the process building rich,
deep, living soils where none had ever existed.
Then we flew to China and for a month to teach introductory
courses in permaculture and natural building in the rural interior. We
certified thirty new permaculture teachers. We spoke at first the inauguration
of the Asian Biochar Institute in Nanjing and then the Second International
Sunshine Ecovillage Forum in Hangzhou. China plans to start 100 ecovillages in
the next 5 years. They now have no shortage of permaculture teachers.
After a quick stop at The Farm to change wardrobe, we
crossed the ocean again, this time at the invitation of the Secretariat of the British Commonwealth,
to join with many esteemed colleagues pulled together to talk about
regenerative design strategies for reversing climate change. Some of the
speakers who appear in our climate mash video were there with us. The suite of
tools we offered should by now be familiar: biochar, agroforestry, permaculture,
community stakeholder empowerment; ecovillage; cooperative microenterprise; and
a closed-loop, circular economy based on building real security for an
uncertain future.
After England we went to Africa, to the Marrakech UN climate
summit — COP22 — on which we reported last week. We were present with
a delegation of 20 GEN folk: Kosha Joubert and Tom Feeney (Global EcovillageNetwork HQ in Scotland), Sarah Queblatin (Philippines), Joshua Konkankoh and
Sonita Mbah (Cameroon), Trinto Mugango (DRC), Ousmane Pame (Senegal), Linda
Kabaira (Zimbabwe), Sa’ad Dagher (Palestine), Vita de Waal (Geneva), Macaco
Tamerice (Damanhurian Federation), Tim Clarke (UK), Michael Farelly(Tanzania), Margarita Zethelius (Colombia), Rob Wheeler, Ethan Hirsch Tauber and Marian Zeitlin (USA) and Alfonso
Flaquer and Fanny van Hal from GEN Europe.
GEN had a booth in the Blue Zone (where the governments meet)
and hosted 4 side events and one Press Conference there along with 6 side events
and one workshop, in the Green Zone (area of Civil Society) and a daily webinar.
We had a beautiful array of well designed materials to share thanks to Camila,
our designer from Colombia, and to Tom, Sarah, Mena, Yael and the HQ team.
We managed to sign an MOU with Morocco for the
implementation of government sponsored ecovillages, starting in the most
Northern region. We also negotiated MOU’s with Mauritania and Senegal, and
ICLEI Africa. We made meaningful links with interested governments in 22 countries
and with the Green Belt Movement, African Development Bank and British
Commonwealth. We found out about existing ecovillage networks in Nepal, Sri
Lanka, India and Bangladesh that were not yet linked to GEN and now can’t wait
to connect. Many individual projects present are also now keen to become part
ofour network.
We have some friends, Guy McPherson and Pauline Schneider,
who arecurrently touring New Zealand,
speaking about the existential threat posed by climate change and what people
should be doing. We always enjoy listening to Guy, and don’t have much to
disagree with him about. He is correct that most climate scientists are too
silo’ed to see the bigger picture and that there is no getting away from the
simple fact that industrial civilization is a heat engine. While any one of the
threats — sea level rise, methane outgassing, ice melt, droughts and
superstorms — is enough to scare anyone, it is only when you sum them
— or multiply them against each other — that they become truly
horrific.
Guy has concluded it is too late to do anything now, so lets
all just buckle in and enjoy the ride. He puts human extinction at 18 months to
ten years. We have that small disagreement.
In our humble opinion something like Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle has to be included in the equation. Heisenberg theorized
that in all wave-like systems the more you can say about position or
some other single attribute the less you can know about momentum or some other
attribute simply due to the matter-wave nature of all quantum objects. Applying
that to the complex of factors that determine our future, the more we can say
about a particular element — the certainty of financial collapse or ecological
crisis, for instance — the less we can know about the timing of such
things.
Like Kevin Anderson, Thomas Goreau, James Hansen and other
scientists who do look at the whole picture, we have concluded that it may not
be too late. We think there’s an outside chance that humans may possess the
collective will and presence of mind to do what must be done, and to do it
quickly, even if it means radically altering, even abolishing, industrial
civilization in favor of Civilization 2.0. We had a taste of that when we went
to China, and we tasted it again in London. Memory being linked to the
olfactory senses, taste is not something one easily forgets.
While the meeting in Marrakech did not produce real progress
the way Paris did a year before, Marrakech did what it had been planning to do
— the Action Agenda — and did not lose ground. From what we could sense there,
there has been a sea change in the international business community, and the
political world may follow along for reasons of money or a sufficient supply of
food, if for nothing else.
Are we too late? Maybe.
Should we stop trying to make a difference when we see a way
to solve this that can actually work? We don’t think so.
That said, we could use some serious financial help about
now. It is not like rural Mayan, African or Chinese permaculturists have money to pay
for instruction. We have spent everything we have, everything we had saved. Nothing
was held back. And now, when we have nothing left with which to keep going, we are
depending entirely on the good will of our friends. Perhaps you would like to
make us prove what we say, and to actually reverse climate change. Will you dare
us to try?
Those viewing this on our web page can use the donation link
in the right column. For everyone else, our PayPal account takes tax-deductible
donations at ecovillage@thefarm.org, or you can write to us there for further
instructions.
This holiday season, our heart is filled with gratitude and
as we look around, we are overwhelmed with the opportunity for profound
change. We'd get by with a little help from our friends. Thanks!
“Ideally, in a democracy, everybody would agree that climate change is the consequence of man-made behavior, because that’s what ninety-nine per cent of scientists tell us. And then we would have a debate about how to fix it. That’s how, in the seventies, eighties, and nineties, you had Republicans supporting the Clean Air Act and you had a market-based fix for acid rain rather than a command-and-control approach. So you’d argue about means, but there was a baseline of facts that we could all work off of. And now we just don’t have that.”
Last week, we recalled the words of Hitler’s social architect Albert Speer, “One seldom recognizes the devil when he is putting his hand on your shoulder.” And yet, despite all the entreaties to slay the beast and make sure its dead — from Ralph Nader, Naomi Klein, Joe Brewer, whomever — we have to confess, after Paris and now after Marrakech, the only highway back to the Holocene that can support mammalian life such as ours is being constructed by and for monster corporations like Citibank and Monsanto.
At a side event in the business tent we sat down in a corner to have some local Arabica while we awaited the next session. We struck up a conversation with the elderly gent in the adjoining seat. He was John Scowcroft, Chief Credit Officer and Executive Managing Director at S&P. We showed him The Biochar Solution and the usual conversation followed. Turns out he is leaving S&P to start a CCS group to seize the profit potential in carbon management futures.
Later, at a side event called Beyond Paris: Investor actions to manage climate risk and seize low-carbon opportunities, we were listening attentively to James Close, World Bank; Erick Decker, AXA Group; Michael Eckhart, Citigroup; Pete Grannis, NY State Comptroller’s Office; Anthony Hobley, Carbon Tracker and others, when Rachel Kyte spotted our book, The Paris Agreement, and leaned over to ask, “Is that any good?”
“Fantastic!” we gushed.
A former Vice President of World Bank, she is Ban Ki Moon’s Special Representative to the business community.
Over the course of the two weeks in Morocco we had brief encounters like this too many times to catalogue. We tell you this not to suggest we are anyone special but to say that in this critical time we — you and I — have been given access.
Historically this is the rarest of moments. Crisis makes for strange bedfellows (ask James Comey and Julian Assange). Citibank, with branches in 160 countries, went from financing $12 billion in green project finance in 2013 to $24 billion in 2014 to $48 billion in 2015 and likely $100 billion this year. Deutsche Bank will tally $350 billion in investments aimed at decarbonization in 2016. More importantly, the big banks have dumped $500 billion in fossil asset portfolios since Paris and would have liked to dump much more if they only had a safe place to park it, even interest-free.
The board rooms have Trump-proofed the Paris Agreement and the whole paradigm shift that came with it. There is absolutely no way any clown show is going to hijack these negotiations now. Wall Street, the Illuminati, the Buddhist monasteries, NeoLib Academe, The Vatican, the Royals and the Chinese Triads are all 110 percent committed. They are shoulder to shoulder in the doorway.
For some it is just prudent risk management and upside profit opportunity. For others it is the stark, cold-sweat, can’t-sleep reality: that absolute annihilation leaves no gloaters behind.
Rachel Kyte told the crowd, “Carbon is an investment risk that is not yet priced in.” This situation is not likely to last much longer. We hovered longest in the venues that were looking at drawdown, and we could see that so much of the finance and political world is focused on technological fixes like geoengineering and CCS (carbon capture and storage) that putting a price on carbon and taxing the polluters is coming, Trump or no. It is the only way you can economically justify those uneconomical, harebrained, bait-and-switch schemes.
In a brief, airport encounter, an IPCC working group leader told us $45 per ton would be needed to make the 2-degree limit achievable with sequestered scrubber gas.
Of course, we know better. Putting carbon underground costs nothing and pays handsome returns if you do it by planting mixed species, mixed age, ecosystemically functioning, climate resilient and rainmaking forests and coppice, pollard and patch renew them periodically to derive food, fiber, building material and most importantly, biochar, to create cascades of products and services in a circular economy with no such thing as waste. That does not require a $45/ton price or even 4 cents. It will earn you vastly more. Real wealth.
The best way to raise land value is to increase its beauty with biodiversity, increase the organic matter in its soils, build humus, make biochar and be a contributing member of the local community. Just doing that reverses climate change and generates multiple revenue streams for any poor sod who stumbles into it.
"Mr. President, I speak for the Commonwealth collectively, a family of 52 member states, among them countries in all continents and oceans that are highly vulnerable to climate change. Our priority is to move from agreement to action. Small islands threatened by rising sea levels and larger states vulnerable to flooding or desertification share the common advantages of a common language, common law, and closely related systems of governance. These similarities enable us to work together without distraction and get straight to the nub of issues.
"High on our agenda for 30 years has been the impact of climate change. This long-standing focus bore fruit a year ago when our Biannual Heads of Government Meeting assembled in Malta. Days before COP21, our member states, in their rich diversity, agreed to set ambition high and paved the way for the Paris Agreement. Our practical and distinctive Commonwealth contribution is technical support, offered by our Climate Finance Access Hub.
"A month ago, we convened a ground breaking and dynamic gathering on Regenerative Development to Reverse Climate Change. It brought together biologists, ecologists, oceanographers and regenerative development specialists to consider ways of reversing the human impacts of climate change. Our focus was on developing positive action for the living world to restore climate balance, including biomimicry, permaculture, ecological engineering, and circular economies. It is through such pioneering approaches, I believe, that as on so many occasions in the past, the potential for our Commonwealth networks’ meetings will be mobilized to lay the foundations on which progressive global consensus can be built to create a safer and more sustainable future for all."
Contrast this to the buffoonery of the apparently tipsy US Secretary of State, obviously winging it:
While the national commitments, or NDCs, that were pledged at Paris in 2015 bend emissions downward, they are still not on a course correcting trajectory. Our planet is moving out of the Neutral Zone, the one location we know of in this galaxy where you may find life. The UNEP’s Emissions Gap Report, even while understating the risk, says we are headed towards 3.4°C warming by 2100 (we think will likely get there much sooner). To get back to a 2-degree "safe" zone (with 66% certainty) we would need 25% lower emissions in 2030 than there are today. And yet, incredible as it may seem, emissions are still rising.
When you are racing against extinction you cannot afford to fritter away time or forget the first rule of holes. 2016 will be the 15th record-breaking year this century in terms of heat, since measurements began. That is 15 new records in 16 years, a pattern any sports fan should recognize as extraordinary. Globally we are already up 1.2 degrees, although closer to 5 degrees near the poles. Humans have never lived on a planet with 400 parts per million CO2 in its atmosphere before.
2ºC is a vanished target now. But this isn’t a 2ºC or bust fight. It’s a fight to limit consequences. It’s a fight for every 1/10th of a degree. If we fail to hold to 2ºC, we have to fight for 2.1º; failing that, we battle on for 2.2º. With millennia of impacts at stake, we never get to give up, even if we end up in 4ºC. For future generations, 4º is still better than 4.1º.
It is useful to remember that in 2007 the Met Office produced a four-degree scenario on behalf of HM Government. Climate scientists from other institutions also contributed their most up-to-date research on climate impacts at the time.
As we mull (or bemoan) the average intelligence of Republican presidents, we recall that it was Group Captain James Stagg, also of the MetOffice, who changed the nail-hard mind of Dwight D. Eisenhower and got him to postpone D-day by 24 hours, despite Operation Neptune being already well underway. The MetOffice is not an outfit whose predictions should be trifled with.
Heat changes will not be the same everywhere. Mid-continent North America and Europe and parts of Africa will be 6-7 degrees warmer. Most of Russia and Africa will be 8 degrees or above.
In densely populated eastern China hottest days of the year are 11°F warmer. In Toronto, Chicago, Ottawa, New York and Washington DC, make that 22°F hotter. Europe is somewhere in between.
The permafrost is gone across vast regions of Canada and Russia. Atmospheric methane, 100 times more effective as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, spikes, inexorably pushing temperatures towards 5 and beyond.
Half of the world’s population has inadequate access to water.
Half of all Himalayan glaciers are significantly reduced, 70% of the water supply to India and China.
In South America, many glaciers disappear completely, taking 75% of Peru’s water with them.
Fish populations crash from acidification and coral loss.
Forested areas burn, including a large area of the United States, Mexico, South America east of the Andes, Southern and East Africa, the Sahel, eastern and southern Europe and Australia.
Maize and wheat yields reduced up to 40% at low latitudes. Soybean yield decreases in all regions. Rice yield declines up to 30% in Asia.
Water supplies to rivers drops up to 70% in many regions.
The loss of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet contributes 3.3 meters to sea level rise. Greenland ice losses add 7 meters globally.
The Netherlands and Southeastern England are inundated. Seychelles, Miami Beach and the Hamptons have disappeared. The San Francisco Bay extends almost to Sacramento. Most of those displaced, however are in India, Bangladesh and Southeast Asia.
So, at four degrees, who would be left to fight for 4.1? What possible good would it do?
Real world tracks scenario RCP 8.5
As we left Marrakech we felt ambivalent about the outcome. Paris had sent the high benchmark and these follow-on COPs are supposed to fit the nuts to the bolts. There was still a very uncomfortable level of pushback amongst the underdeveloping, with India and Indonesia, both big coal users, saying that economic growth had precedence over near-term emissions cuts. Turkey is planning to build 70 new coal plants. These errors assure the already underdeveloping will continue digging a deeper hole for themselves. New Zealand, which talks a good disinvestment game, plans to increase petroleum exports from $3 billion to $30 billion per year by 2025.
All countries’ leaders need to take stock, a point that was made poignantly clear by this slide from the MetOffice:
It shows that the world cannot begin atmospheric carbon drawdown later than 2020 — three years from now — or the two degrees red line will be broken.
Clear next steps emerged from discussions: end fossil fuel subsidies (including fracking); phase out coal and then ban it; cancel all new fossil fuel infrastructure orders (including supertankers, arctic exploration and DAPL); set higher efficiency standards; subsidize agroforestry and renewables (down to zero cost); enforce LDN (Land Degradation Neutrality — no net land loss to sprawl, desertification or deforestation — 102 countries have signed on); and reform agriculture to an organic, no-till standard.
These next steps got no farther than discussions, however, and what emerged from Marrakech was more palliative statements and promises that next year will be better. Tick tock. Clown show. Tick tock. "Time is not on our side." (John Kerry) Tick tock. (Donald Trump) Tick tock.
We have always wanted to get to this town, ever since we were a young hippy hitching through Europe in 1966 and our rides took us along the southern coasts of France, Spain and Italy. Fate did not carry us here then, but perhaps we are making up for lost time now. Honestly, later in life is probably better.
We find ourselves in the company of brilliant people engaged in transforming the world. While nearly the whole of our 7 billion monkey minds seem transfixed by the US election result, a few of us are quietly sneaking around all that to sew the seeds of what comes next, after the Trumpocalypse.
We could say that the Trump victory was not a global disaster but we would be lying. Dmitry Orlov observed that we at least seem to have avoided World War III with Russia. Naomi Klein, Christopher Nesbitt and Richard Heinberg have eloquently pointed out that the Democratic Party neoliberal hegemony has been shattered, and Ugo Bardi reminds us that Italy survived 20 years of Berlusconi, after all. These are all pluses, but they will not prevent disaster if The Donald has an itchy trigger finger after a few scotches late one night and decides to nuke, say, Cuba.
For Cuba, and for any other country that lacks the means to acquire a missile defense shield, we recommend they immediately put a Trump Tower in their capital. Trump Casino Habana could be world class, totally revamping the weatherbeaten but still popular Malecone boardwalk.
We are watching this drama from within the halls of COP22 as it plays out on the plasma screens in the halls and media centers of Bab Ighli. Some may think what we are doing here is now totally irrelevant, but take it from us on faith, if not on our own warped logic, it’s not.
We have written in the past about the rise and fall of many civilizations and most, if not all, of those had their peak moment just before collapse when their capitals became a clown show. Recall, if you can, the Roman Colosseum, the Mayan pyramid sacrifices, or the Nazi extravaganzas choreographed by Albert Speer.
Albert Speer famously said, “One seldom recognizes the devil when he is putting his hand on your shoulder.”
While the clown show has been playing out in North America, the 22d UN climate conference has kicked off in Marrakech. It has brought together tens of thousands of NGOs, governments and people from all around the world to respond to the existential crisis of climate change.
Existential crises don’t just disappear because the US holds an election. This one is still gathering momentum. It is coming at us like a bullet train.
Marrakech is the first post-Paris meeting of world leaders. It is an important one because having taken the enormous step of setting hard red lines last year — 2 degrees firm, 1.5 aspirational — countries now have to figure out exactly how those goals can be attained. On the negotiating table are mechanisms for finance, monitoring, increasing ambitions, and drawdown.
We are mainly focused on that last item. Emissions reductions are now a done deal. Fossil fuels, including the Dakota Access Pipeline, are on their way to being legally banned whether largely clueless USAnians understand that or not. (Which is not to say the Standing Rock water protectors are not absolutely right to try to preserve their patrimony in the meantime.) What logically follows is a need to start pulling carbon from the atmosphere and as quickly as possible to return both oceans and air to pre-industrial carbon concentrations. There is a scientifically validated and economical way to do that, using carbon farming, regenerative agroforestry, and waste-biomass-to-biochar energy systems, but the hitch is not science or technology. It’s people.
We need to have a carrier medium for this viral paradigm switch; one that can overcome cultural inertia and provide an inviting path forward — a bandwagon rolling through the clown circus. Hop aboard!
Ecovillages weave together the ecological, economic, social and cultural dimensions of the new circular economy (no such thing as waste) by pioneering innovative solutions that enable towns, districts, regions and nation states to achieve the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the goals of the Paris Agreement.
The Global Ecovillage Network (GEN) is bringing to the table the ‘Pan-African Ecovillage Development Programme’ designed to radically reform current development practices and put communities, ecological generation, and nonmonetary, post-growth wealth creation at the heart of the development process. The full and inclusive participation of communities on the ground from conception to implementation, together with the sharing and transferring of expertise and personally grounded experience, is the key to success.
The results speak for themselves. Africa is home to some of the most innovative ecovillage programs in the world. In Senegal the success of grassroots ecovillage communities has led to the development of a National Ecovillage Agency working to transform 14,000 rural villages into ecovillages. In Egypt the Sekem farm and ecovillage is working with over 800 organic and biodynamic farmers, providing educational programs at the pre-school to university level, and delivering healthcare to more than 40.000 people from 11 surrounding villages. The President of Burkina Faso has declared his intention to implement 2000 ecovillages by 2020. GEN is in process of signing MOU’s with several national governments at COP22.
This success is an example of GEN’s ‘Transition Strategy’ in action - transitioning existing settlements to sustainable settlements and scaling up partnerships with governments, NGOs, and donors to implement policies and solutions at local, regional, and international levels. Building on 20 years of global networking, sustainable development, groundbreaking grassroots work and education, GEN’s intent is to continue to create these types of transformational alliances that grease the skids.
GEN is also using COP22 to announce the launch of the ‘GEN Consultancy,' a highly skilled and diverse network of expert consultants that seek to share some of the world’s best practices in the field of community sustainability and resilience. GEN’s solution is not top-down after the usual UNEP/UNDP model, but empowering the millions of small solutions from people and projects within their own communities.
If the Trump election, Brexit, and the recent anti-peace-deal vote in Colombia show anything, it is that we are across a threshold now where backroom deals, newspaper and politico endorsements, money and even common sense no longer dictate an outcome. Consider the fact that Hillary Clinton could rig the ballots in Honduras and Ukraine or bemoan (in emails) the failure of the State Department to rig the elections in Palestine, but could not rig her own election (though try as she did).
Social media, reality TV, yellow internet journalism and flash mobs are now in control. In this new world, the herd is driven by raw impulses of fear and pleasure-seeking. The ecovillage lure, whether dangled as a prepper redoubt or as a happy eutopia (Lat.: a good place), offers a clear choice. With cool villages that draw down carbon and give us energy, food and water security in exchange, ecovillages offer the right impulse at the perfect historical moment.
"
-->
We are selling timeshares to help build residences
for our trainees.
"
-->
We are on our way across the Atlantic as we post this. It is
our third crossing in ten days. When our Bates family ancestors made the
passage in 1630 it took nine and a half weeks.
To draw enough carbon from the atmosphere to return us to
pre-industrial concentrations on decadal timescales may require foregoing air
travel in the not-to-distant future, an era that may arrive fairly soon if jet
fuel loses its externalized subsidies in forthcoming UN climate talks.
Emissions cuts will be needed but are not sufficient. We
need enough new forest to cover four Spains each year. Moreover, we will need
to keep those forests in harvest rotations that optimize soil carbon. We will require
100 million people to perform this new kind of work. We will need to hold their interest by
improving farm profits, food security and living standards. Those things have
to be good enough that, when push comes to shove, the farmers don’t just cut
their new forest down and burn it.
The good news: we know how to do this. We are doing it. We
are already succeeding. We need to ramp it up. If we can train 1000 trainers,
and they can each train 1000 trainers, each of whom can advise 100 farms, we
can rescue the climate, and quickly. We can get back the Holocene.
But we need more green learning centers to do this sort of training.
Our first is in the Dominican Republic, where we are modeling the whole enchilada
of climate repair methods within a 30000-hectare valley, with 95% offset for
biodiversity and carbon drawdown. Within the 5% developed area, there is a
“beyond zero” emissions sink. Even the developed part is drawing down.
This is not the first training center we have built. We have
done a few now with the Global Ecovillage Network, in different countries. The
prototype, although it benefitted from the experience of trials before it, is
our Ecovillage Training Center at The Farm. ETC was designed in the early 90s
to meet the needs of what we correctly foresaw as a revolution in how humans
inhabit the Earth. ETC was designed to grease the skids.
In 1991 we attended a meeting of interesting people
assembled at the country farm of Ross and Hildur Jackson in Denmark. It was one
of those kinds of meetings that only run a few days but which produce lifelong
friendships — as you meet with kindred spirits whose paths and yours seem to have
traipsed many lifetimes.
We came back to Tennessee and started a quarterly
newsletter, The Design Exchange, and
from that we gradually evolved the notion for a training center. We were
exploring a new paradigm in learning — an immersion pedagogy that blended
residential courses inside a 25-year-old ecovillage and outreach programs on
six continents. Because of our history with Plenty, the Farm’s relief and
development charity, our curriculum was strongly influenced by indigenous
wisdom. The core of it was learning to get along with nature, and be
respectful, instead of trying to bully her all the time.
The new branch on our tree is called El Valle. It takes the
ecovillage training concept to where it needs to go for the next half century.
It builds on what we have learned over the past decades and anticipates at
least some of the changes now coming our way.
The Farm was a good model because it already net sequesters
five times its own carbon footprint, accomplishing that trick with a nifty
blend of keylined fields, injected brews of microbes and enzymes, biochar from
bamboo, living roofs, and mixed-age, mixed species hardwood forest. The last of
those is the real workhorse, drawing millions of tons of CO2 from the air and
sending the carbon deep underground, or shaping it into standing oaks that will
later be converted to various types of long-term storage.
This is a model that needs to scale, but one has to always
be cautious when using that word. Not everything gets better by getting bigger.
There is a point of diminishing returns in all things, from cabbage patches to
governments. One need only point to what is happening in the European Union or
the former Soviet Union to drive that home. In the case of ecovillages, what is
needed is not ecocities but many more small polities, such as we see with
Transition Towns.
The bottleneck in making that transition is not land or
money. Climate change is coming at us with such force and fury that assets are being
made available, quickly. In China some of the best land in the countryside —
abandoned Buddhist monasteries and old emperial palace sites, for instance
— are being granted to ecovillagers to get something going. The bottleneck
is people. There are not enough people with the right skills to get a
modern-day ecovillage up and keep it going. There are plenty of earnest youth
and older people with work skills, but few have any sense of how to keyline a
hillside, make biochar, brew compost tea, extract leaf proteins, or build a cob
and strawbale four-season greenhouse.
Our Tennessee Center can only train so many, assuming they
can even run the State Department gauntlet to enter the United States for 2 or
3 months. We need more immersion learning sites all over the globe, beginning
in the parts where the interest is strongest and the governments are most
supportive.
So it came to be that we have broken ground in the Dominican
Republic. The green learning "Terra Lodges" at El Valle will be our platform from which
to train trainers. It will be a model for a new generation of similar
platforms. For the past two years we have been building the El Valle
ecodistrict into a state-of-the-art carbon drawdown technology showcase.
Working through a transition pathway with local residents that will improve the
quality of their lives on their own terms, we have brought in some of the
world’s best master planners and conservation experts. We have designed
integrated eco-agroforestry, aquaponics and chinampas, a biorefinery to produce
a host of valuable nutriceuticals, foods, feeds and fibers from the pyrolysis
of biomass wastes (such as coconut coir) into biochar, and workers
cooperatives, all within and about a three-ecovillage ecodistrict.
Most of that is not new. We just put it all together in one
place. To get to the next step, we are doing crowdfunding. That’s the part that’s
got a new wrinkle.
Would you like to live in such a place, perhaps just part of
the year? Maybe where you live now suits you, but there are certain times when
it is dark and cold most days, or certain other times when it is swelteringly
hot and the days never seem to end. If that’s the case, or you just like a
little adventure, El Valle may have something to offer.
We are selling timeshares to help build residences for our
trainees.
Our Terra Lodge concept was born out of the need to teach
how to profitably cool the climate. Cool living is the solution. We have designed integrated
human/natural systems that are antifragileandabundant, where no villager need feel any concern for lack of
food, water, or shelter from the storms of our grandchildren.
There are many people who want to do something that benefits
the world and generates income. The Terra Lodges and El Valle immersion learning complex will give
climate activists new skills with which anyone can create a meaningful
life anywhere in the world and become part of
the growing “regenerative work” landscape.
How we will build our physical infrastructure is by selling
cabins. There is only one level of donation for this campaign: usd$30,000.
There is only one perk: a cabin that you will own outright,
subject to the eco-covenants that apply to all residents. Your perk cabin:
•Is
constructed of organic, sustainable materials
•Is
designed for fresh air circulation
•Includes
a complete off-grid energy system
•Comes
fully furnished
•Has 1 bedroom and bath
•Has
27.5m2 indoor and 27.5m2 outdoor sheltered areas
•Is
on 1300m2 land
•Will
give you $2400 annual return on what you pay for the title for the privilege of
leasing it for 10 months each year.
•If
occupancy exceeds 60-percent your ROI rises accordingly
We need to build capacity, fast. Where can you get a
guaranteed annual return on your savings, with these added features?
You can help us fund this, and if you like, you can join our
new ecovillage there and make some really interesting new friends. Or not.
Perhaps for you this is just a socially responsible investment. One that invests
in your grandchildren’s future.
Our cool "SCOOL' will rent your cabin for 10
months each year. In exchange, you will receive a return on your investment of
8 percent annually. If your cabin’s occupancy is above 60 percent, your return
on investment will be doubled. You have the right to use your cabin 2 months
per year, with all these needs provided:
Local organic food
Drinking
water
Sanitation
Energy
Waste
treatment
Internet
Weekly
cleaning
Laundry
Trash
collection
10yr
maintenance and repair
Booking,
rental & admin.
Security
Since 2015, ECO2 COOL DESIGN SAS, a registered company in
the Dominican Republic, has been developing an ecovillage masterplan in El
Valle. The Terra Lodge cabins are the first step
in launching this carbon drawdown project.
In a few hours we shall be landing in Marrakech.
We plan to hawk these timeshares to some of our activist friends during COP-22.
Our agenda is drawdown. We are betting that some of those attending will see
the value of that too. But just to be sure, before we left home we planted more than enough trees to cancel out the climate costs of all this crazy travel.
The Great Change is published whenever the spirit moves me. Writings on this site are purely the opinion of Albert Bates and are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike 3.0 "unported" copyright. People are free to share (i.e, to copy, distribute and transmit this work) and to build upon and adapt this work – under the following conditions of attribution, n on-commercial use, and share alike: Attribution (BY): You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non-Commercial (NC): You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike (SA): If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. Nothing in this license is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use or other limitations on the exclusive rights of the copyright owner under copyright law or other applicable laws. Therefore, the content of this publication may be quoted or cited as per fair use rights. Any of the conditions of this license can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder (i.e., the Author). Where the work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license. For the complete Creative Commons legal code affecting this publication, see here. Writings on this site do not constitute legal or financial advice, and do not reflect the views of any other firm, employer, or organization. Information on this site is not classified and is not otherwise subject to confidentiality or non-disclosure.