Giving Thanks is a Revolutionary Act
"We think there’s an
outside chance that humans may possess the collective will and presence of mind
to do what must be done, and to do it quickly, even if it means radically
altering, even abolishing, industrial civilization."
The 4 per 1000 initiative (the French government’s campaign — 4 grams increase of soil carbon per year in every kilogram of farmed earth) remains the best game in town, whether your town is Paris, Marrakech, or in 2017, Bonn. It would, in the French government's theory (supported by IPCC's notion of a "carbon budget" but called into question by the latest report cards from the Tyndall Centre and others) be enough to hold climate change at 1.5 degrees, if universally adopted.
That 2014 COP-20 proposal, “Soil for food security and climate” became part of the “Lima-Paris Action Agenda” and then, two weeks ago at COP-22, the “Global Climate Action Agenda,” but the word 'soil' only made it once into the Marrakech Action Proclamation at the end of COP-22, and that was in reference to the venue being "on African soil." The word 'agriculture' was completely absent.
However, if you read the outcome document liberally to assume the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC), or the UN's pledge system, constitutes the action agenda at present, then there may still be some hope.
While the 4 per 1000 initiative gained no new additions to the 37 nations who endorsed in Paris, many NDPs are starting to reflect the realization that putting carbon back in the ground might be a cheap way to meet their goals. This includes the United States, which last May issued a “Climate Smart” agriculture and forestry plan. The word 'biochar' does not appear in that 60-page plan. Pyrolysis is only mentioned in the context of a way to reduce methane from concentrated animal farming wastes. This is the US-DUH, remember?
The influence of heroic biochar researcher Hans Peter Schmidt was evident at the margins of the event, where Swiss biotech company Zaluvida Corporate AG pitched for venture capital from business leaders to support its natural solution to reduce methane emissions in cows, Mootral(TM). Mootral is a feed supplement made from biochar infused with garlic and citric extract. Just 10 grams a day reduces bovine flatulence 30 percent while increasing weight gain and lactose production. According to the literature handed out by Zaluvida, feeding every cow a daily dose of Mootral would be the same as taking 200 million cars off the road. An antibiotic version is scheduled for release next year after it receives patent approval.
At The Farm we celebrate Indigenous People’s Day with only
slightly more gratitude than other days. We shared a large covered-dish potluck
in the Great Hall, part of our still-under-construction EcoHostel. We welcomed
back our younger brothers and sisters who were up at Standing Rock helping in
whatever way The Farm can. We sent blessings to those who had gone up to take
their place.
It is not a little ironic that USAnians take a national
holiday to celebrate the lifesaving generosity of indigenous peoples towards
the Pilgrims while simultaneously unleashing water cannons, pepper spray and
dogs on those same peoples as they try to protect our shared patrimony, in
this case a river that affects the lives of 40 million people. We bless the
sacred water that makes our life possible, here, as well as there.
Two years have passed since we produced a video
mashup for a winter Indiegogo campaign, our last big crowdfunding effort. It
was a trifle dour, we admit, but as the Earth tilts its Northern Hemisphere
away from the sun and daylight gets scarcer, the plant-world moves underground,
and we bundle from the cold, it is easy to fall into thoughts of contraction
and decline.
Being overstretched from recent efforts, we could use some
serious donations again right now, but we find that there would be no point in
trying to revise or update that short video, because it is just as true today
as it was then, the US election notwithstanding.
Since we made that mashup, we went to the Paris climate
conference and watched as the world finally agreed to take some baby steps in
the right direction, which we, after Paul Hawken, now call “drawdown” — as in
taking carbon out the atmosphere and putting it back into the soil.
The 4 per 1000 initiative (the French government’s campaign — 4 grams increase of soil carbon per year in every kilogram of farmed earth) remains the best game in town, whether your town is Paris, Marrakech, or in 2017, Bonn. It would, in the French government's theory (supported by IPCC's notion of a "carbon budget" but called into question by the latest report cards from the Tyndall Centre and others) be enough to hold climate change at 1.5 degrees, if universally adopted.
That 2014 COP-20 proposal, “Soil for food security and climate” became part of the “Lima-Paris Action Agenda” and then, two weeks ago at COP-22, the “Global Climate Action Agenda,” but the word 'soil' only made it once into the Marrakech Action Proclamation at the end of COP-22, and that was in reference to the venue being "on African soil." The word 'agriculture' was completely absent.
However, if you read the outcome document liberally to assume the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC), or the UN's pledge system, constitutes the action agenda at present, then there may still be some hope.
While the 4 per 1000 initiative gained no new additions to the 37 nations who endorsed in Paris, many NDPs are starting to reflect the realization that putting carbon back in the ground might be a cheap way to meet their goals. This includes the United States, which last May issued a “Climate Smart” agriculture and forestry plan. The word 'biochar' does not appear in that 60-page plan. Pyrolysis is only mentioned in the context of a way to reduce methane from concentrated animal farming wastes. This is the US-DUH, remember?
The influence of heroic biochar researcher Hans Peter Schmidt was evident at the margins of the event, where Swiss biotech company Zaluvida Corporate AG pitched for venture capital from business leaders to support its natural solution to reduce methane emissions in cows, Mootral(TM). Mootral is a feed supplement made from biochar infused with garlic and citric extract. Just 10 grams a day reduces bovine flatulence 30 percent while increasing weight gain and lactose production. According to the literature handed out by Zaluvida, feeding every cow a daily dose of Mootral would be the same as taking 200 million cars off the road. An antibiotic version is scheduled for release next year after it receives patent approval.
Last Christmas we produced The Paris Agreement: The Best Chance We Have To Save The Only Planet We’ve Got, a short book telling our eyewitness account of the treaty’s
creation, including most of the new evidence as of that date, and making for
the first time a copy of the actual treaty available on Amazon.com or in any
bookstore.
This year we redoubled our efforts in those places where we think
we might do the most good. We went to the Dominican Republic to advise a
three-village ecodistrict of El Valle that will draw down massive amounts of
carbon while raising the standards of living of its rural peoples. The El Valle model shows
that environmental enhancement and economic development are not adversaries for
limited funds, but co-engines of the new, carbon-smart economy.
In March we taught the tenth annual permaculture course at Maya
Mountain Research Farm in Belize. Maya Mountain is significant to us because it
has it all: starting with poor soils and hilly terrain that had been in corn
and cattle too long, Christopher Nesbitt transformed it into one of the best
examples of integrated agroforestry and carbon drawdown on the planet, with
aquaponics, biochar and some of the best permaculture design that we can point
to. The more students from all over the world we can run through that place
every February, the better.
Back at The Farm we provided another season of permaculture
courses, apprenticeships and natural building through the Ecovillage Training Center, now in its 22nd year. We hosted the annual Kids to the Country summer
camp for city kids. From there we bounced to Mexico to advise a massive
3-ecovillage development called Puertas del Cielo that, like the project in the
Dominican Republic transforms the way humans construct their built environment.
The master plan is being developed by Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG), the Danish
architects who designed the new World Trade Center in lower Manhattan and the
Google complex in Silicon Valley. This is good news for ecovillage design.
In the fall we put together a team to go after the MacArthur
Foundation’s 100 and Change prize. Our proposal is, after the fashion of El Valle or Puertas, to transform the lives of
100 million farmers with biochar, B-corp cooperatives, and climate ecoforestry.
From there we flew to Corvallis, Oregon and the NorthAmerican Biochar Symposium and a meeting of the U.S. Biochar Initiative.
Biochar holds the key to unlocking our climate predicament. Like the first
Thanksgiving, it was a gift to us from the landlords, who learned how to make biochar-rich soils 8000 years before the Columbian Encounter, in the process building rich,
deep, living soils where none had ever existed.
Then we flew to China and for a month to teach introductory
courses in permaculture and natural building in the rural interior. We
certified thirty new permaculture teachers. We spoke at first the inauguration
of the Asian Biochar Institute in Nanjing and then the Second International
Sunshine Ecovillage Forum in Hangzhou. China plans to start 100 ecovillages in
the next 5 years. They now have no shortage of permaculture teachers.
After a quick stop at The Farm to change wardrobe, we
crossed the ocean again, this time at the invitation of the Secretariat of the British Commonwealth,
to join with many esteemed colleagues pulled together to talk about
regenerative design strategies for reversing climate change. Some of the
speakers who appear in our climate mash video were there with us. The suite of
tools we offered should by now be familiar: biochar, agroforestry, permaculture,
community stakeholder empowerment; ecovillage; cooperative microenterprise; and
a closed-loop, circular economy based on building real security for an
uncertain future.
After England we went to Africa, to the Marrakech UN climate
summit — COP22 — on which we reported last week. We were present with
a delegation of 20 GEN folk: Kosha Joubert and Tom Feeney (Global EcovillageNetwork HQ in Scotland), Sarah Queblatin (Philippines), Joshua Konkankoh and
Sonita Mbah (Cameroon), Trinto Mugango (DRC), Ousmane Pame (Senegal), Linda
Kabaira (Zimbabwe), Sa’ad Dagher (Palestine), Vita de Waal (Geneva), Macaco
Tamerice (Damanhurian Federation), Tim Clarke (UK), Michael Farelly (Tanzania), Margarita Zethelius (Colombia), Rob Wheeler, Ethan Hirsch Tauber and Marian Zeitlin (USA) and Alfonso
Flaquer and Fanny van Hal from GEN Europe.
GEN had a booth in the Blue Zone (where the governments meet)
and hosted 4 side events and one Press Conference there along with 6 side events
and one workshop, in the Green Zone (area of Civil Society) and a daily webinar.
We had a beautiful array of well designed materials to share thanks to Camila,
our designer from Colombia, and to Tom, Sarah, Mena, Yael and the HQ team.
We managed to sign an MOU with Morocco for the
implementation of government sponsored ecovillages, starting in the most
Northern region. We also negotiated MOU’s with Mauritania and Senegal, and
ICLEI Africa. We made meaningful links with interested governments in 22 countries
and with the Green Belt Movement, African Development Bank and British
Commonwealth. We found out about existing ecovillage networks in Nepal, Sri
Lanka, India and Bangladesh that were not yet linked to GEN and now can’t wait
to connect. Many individual projects present are also now keen to become part
of our network.
We have some friends, Guy McPherson and Pauline Schneider,
who are currently touring New Zealand,
speaking about the existential threat posed by climate change and what people
should be doing. We always enjoy listening to Guy, and don’t have much to
disagree with him about. He is correct that most climate scientists are too
silo’ed to see the bigger picture and that there is no getting away from the
simple fact that industrial civilization is a heat engine. While any one of the
threats — sea level rise, methane outgassing, ice melt, droughts and
superstorms — is enough to scare anyone, it is only when you sum them
— or multiply them against each other — that they become truly
horrific.
Guy has concluded it is too late to do anything now, so lets
all just buckle in and enjoy the ride. He puts human extinction at 18 months to
ten years. We have that small disagreement.
In our humble opinion something like Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle has to be included in the equation. Heisenberg theorized
that in all wave-like systems the more you can say about position or
some other single attribute the less you can know about momentum or some other
attribute simply due to the matter-wave nature of all quantum objects. Applying
that to the complex of factors that determine our future, the more we can say
about a particular element — the certainty of financial collapse or ecological
crisis, for instance — the less we can know about the timing of such
things.
Like Kevin Anderson, Thomas Goreau, James Hansen and other
scientists who do look at the whole picture, we have concluded that it may not
be too late. We think there’s an outside chance that humans may possess the
collective will and presence of mind to do what must be done, and to do it
quickly, even if it means radically altering, even abolishing, industrial
civilization in favor of Civilization 2.0. We had a taste of that when we went
to China, and we tasted it again in London. Memory being linked to the
olfactory senses, taste is not something one easily forgets.
While the meeting in Marrakech did not produce real progress
the way Paris did a year before, Marrakech did what it had been planning to do
— the Action Agenda — and did not lose ground. From what we could sense there,
there has been a sea change in the international business community, and the
political world may follow along for reasons of money or a sufficient supply of
food, if for nothing else.
Are we too late? Maybe.
Should we stop trying to make a difference when we see a way
to solve this that can actually work? We don’t think so.
That said, we could use some serious financial help about
now. It is not like rural Mayan, African or Chinese permaculturists have money to pay
for instruction. We have spent everything we have, everything we had saved. Nothing
was held back. And now, when we have nothing left with which to keep going, we are
depending entirely on the good will of our friends. Perhaps you would like to
make us prove what we say, and to actually reverse climate change. Will you dare
us to try?
Those viewing this on our web page can use the donation link
in the right column. For everyone else, our PayPal account takes tax-deductible
donations at ecovillage@thefarm.org, or you can write to us there for further
instructions.
This holiday season, our heart is filled with gratitude and
as we look around, we are overwhelmed with the opportunity for profound
change. We'd get by with a little help from our friends. Thanks!
Comments