tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1575603731696062553.post8529659742278624898..comments2024-03-27T16:08:30.313-05:00Comments on The Great Change: Viral ConspiraciesAlbert Bateshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17627996921976501534noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1575603731696062553.post-86976819120308715772017-02-13T12:50:11.933-06:002017-02-13T12:50:11.933-06:00Thank you for your blog, Albert. Your amazing life...Thank you for your blog, Albert. Your amazing life experience and your permaculture orientation makes you one of the few people in the world whom I completely trust and look to. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1575603731696062553.post-41006784859167948282017-02-09T09:47:55.236-06:002017-02-09T09:47:55.236-06:00I would encourage anyone to look at the bigger pic...I would encourage anyone to look at the bigger picture as far as 9/11 is concerned. America has been built on a very special type of oil. The infrastructure can only be maintained using this oil and almost all of the vehicles; the cars, trucks, planes,trains and ships can only run on this oil. The oil is called very cheap oil.<br /><br />The amount of expensive oil in the world is almost limitless but no modern economy is able to run on the expensive sort and America's own cheap oil peaked well over 40 years ago. If 9/11 had worked out properly the US would by now have total control of the oil-fields of Iraq and happy motoring would have been given a new lease of life.<br /><br />I have no doubt the US government will do whatever it takes to maintain the American way of life; that is what you all elected it to do isn't it? Looked at from that perspective the loss of 3000 souls was a small price to pay in a gamble to postpone the inevitable mayhem in which many more people could die. The alternative to 9/11 was for the Administration to start an adult conversation with the people of the USA back in 1970 when your cheap oil production was starting to decline. But that was never going to happen now was it? Here in the UK we came much later to the oil age with our relatively cheap oil peaking in 1999. No hint that HMG is about to instigate such a conversation here. But if a fall in standard of living is mentioned it may be that all of the adults you see around you would turn in a moment into that child you see bawling its eyes out because it can't get what it wants. In other words there may be no adults to have the conversation with. <br /><br />Only time will tellNobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12577787352093823944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1575603731696062553.post-86843075554150524472017-02-06T12:38:50.363-06:002017-02-06T12:38:50.363-06:00Thank you for this: " Now that President Trum...<br />Thank you for this: " Now that President Trump has brought fake news out into the open, is it safe to call bullshit on the 9/11 story? " <br />Nothing - absolutely nothing will change in this country until we address this foundational lie at the heart of our politics. Kelpie Wilsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02432488909459005408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1575603731696062553.post-74772898775279995372017-02-06T07:04:06.270-06:002017-02-06T07:04:06.270-06:00My boss pointed out the edge of the energy cliff t...My boss pointed out the edge of the energy cliff to me in 1969. His opinion was we were going to "bet the farm" on fusion/uninvented battery tech. (we were working on long range planning of the UK’s motorway network). Seems he was correct. It has to be said we both had a background in Structural Engineering so we shared a common language and I was no stranger to the Laws of Thermodynamics. For me the only real question has been would the people of the world be so stupid as to use up the planets wealth (ie. its easy oil) in a 40 year binge. I think I answered that one within a few years.<br /><br />I only learnt about AGW in 1975 so the next question was will you all be dumb enough to fry the planet in the process of burning all the easy oil. Well it didn't take too long to answer that one either.<br /><br />And 9/11? The Structural Engineer in me wondered as the first tower was collapsing just who would be stupid enough to believe a plane had brought it down. And the answer? Just about the whole world except a bunch of engineers/architects/airline pilots. The usual suspects ie. people who know their science/maths. <br /><br />Seems to me that if you want answers it is really just a matter of asking the right questions of the right people- hint try to avoid politicians, priests, the media,in fact anyone offering an answer that attempts to make you feel comfortable! It may be that without a good grounding in the basic physical laws of the universe you are not even equipped to form a sensible question but if you had been interested in reality as a young person the trajectory of our race would be of no surprise to youNobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12577787352093823944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1575603731696062553.post-30906265120205505942017-02-05T15:48:19.453-06:002017-02-05T15:48:19.453-06:00Firstly, in any crime one must establish that a cr...Firstly, in any crime one must establish that a crime was committed. The skyscraper architectural/engineering community has done that.<br /><br />Secondly, to solve the crime is a separate question, but one usually begins with motive and opportunity. You see no motive apart from that which would justify wearing tinfoil hats and on this we are not far apart. The well-known group, <a rel="nofollow">Project for a New American Century, </a> provided motive ("make American strong again") and was able to draw together enough top-shelf tinfoil fashionplates to supply abundant opportunity. <br /><br />Hope this helps.Albert Bateshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17627996921976501534noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1575603731696062553.post-1008421910039550512017-02-05T13:41:09.494-06:002017-02-05T13:41:09.494-06:00If the apparently obvious and physically reasonabl...If the apparently obvious and physically reasonable explanation for the downing of the twin towers (terrorists flew planes into them) is taken to be false, then a plausible explanation for the faking of that act is needed. False flag operations can happen, but when they do the motives are usually obvious. What possible motive do you see for the US government, or any one else, faking the 9/11 attacks? I see none, except those that would also justify the wearing of tinfoil hats.Joehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01251330546889158364noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1575603731696062553.post-35321943368710513802017-02-05T09:53:39.399-06:002017-02-05T09:53:39.399-06:00Carl Rove: “We’re an empire now, and when we act, ...Carl Rove: “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality – judiciously, as you will – we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” <br />True enough, journalists are doomed to comment on the acts of our government. It's what they have to do. They are not actors in Carl Rove's reality. But on the other hand, each and every one of us is an actor while at the same time a spectator on the actions of everyone else. We each get to act out our own reality and have the option to ignore the Carl Roves who think that their actions are the only ones that count.<br />Wolfgang Brinckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08314364206955412017noreply@blogger.com